|
Peter Lennon's
Rocky Road
Peter
Lennon, director of the 1968's Irish documentary Rocky
Road to Dublin, is interviewed by Carol Murphy.
In the late 60's Peter
Lennon was living in Paris as a freelance journalist for the
Guardian newspaper. When he was sent to Dublin to review
the Theatre Festival he was struck by a level of denial amongst
his drinking pals in relation to the idea that Ireland had
changed, that 'censorship was a thing of the past' and that
the population no longer in thrall to the omnipotent presence
of the clergy. What was said and what Lennon experienced in
Ireland were two different things. So he persuaded the Guardian
to let him stay on in Dublin to investigate, resulting in
a series of articles with titles such as 'Climate of Repression'
and 'Grey Eminence'. Uproar ensued. Lennon then had the idea
to make a documentary 'in which Ireland would condemn itself
out of its own mouth'. But how?
Soaked in the sensibilities of French filmmaking
and the idea of the 'camera stilo', Lennon raised funds from
a friend, hired cameraman Raoul Coutard, most famous for his
work with Godard and Truffaut, and approached what became
The Rocky Road To Dublin with a clear idea of what he
wanted to do in order to answer the question - what happens
to a nation once the revolution is attained?
Filmed on 16mm in black and white The Rocky
Road to Dublin sits somewhere between fine art film and
documentary. It raises a collection of questions about the
state of a repressed and religiously indoctrinated Ireland
in the late sixties. These questions manifest themselves through
a series of interviews and interactions with representatives
of the most powerful institutions in the country and the least
powerful and underrepresented - from following an all singing
and dancing Catholic priest, Father Michael Cleary, on his
rounds to interviewing John Huston, in Ireland filming his
latest feature. Alongside the interviews and voice over narration
the film features absolutely wonderful footage of Dublin in
the late sixties where the camera, with great affection, films,
amongst other things, a session in a local pub, students dancing
at a student club, laughing children chasing the camera along
Dublin streets and the rough and tumble of a hurling match.
The humour in The Rocky Road, which sometimes
makes Father Ted look like social realism, is underpinned
by examples of religious repression. It is heart breaking
to watched confused school children reiterate warped interpretations
of the catechism, or a quiet and put upon female student or
to listen to a young married woman who is told by her local
priest to sleep in a separate room than her husband after
seeking his help with her marital problems.
After the closure of the Cannes Film Festival
in 1968, directly after the screening of The Rocky Road
To Dublin, Lennon's film was picked up by demonstrating
students and the French Press alike. The Rocky Road
was screened in Dublin for three weeks to packed audiences
but unsurprisingly due to an amalgam of institutional and
aggressive media propaganda the film was banned in Ireland
and left unseen for almost 40 years.
I think that The Rocky Road is a very
affectionate film but when I see the scenes of Father Michael
Cleary singing to the women in the hospital ward I find it
funny but it is also really tragic.
He was a horribly patronising and vain creature.
Yes but I also thought he was a complete
pawn.
A complete pawn himself?
Yes.
The thing was that I applied to the hierarchy
to give me a priest and they knew at that time that I had
these four critical articles about the church and so they
thought that the way that I would be bowled over would be
to send me a singing and dancing priest - which shows what
level of spirituality they were operating in Ireland. The
agreement was that he would tell us from day to day where
he would go and we could follow him and keep our distance
so he had complete freedom. He illustrated what we wanted
to illustrate which was that the priest was your father and
your brother and friend, he'll sing to you in hospital, he'll
dance at your grave as it were. They weren't storm troopers
or anything like that but they were there to always make sure
that people kept the party line.
I think that the affection in the film is
present in the timing that you give to certain scenes. For
example there were so many of the scenes were I felt indulged
and I didn't want them to end for example the scene of the
children running, or people singing in a pub.
Well when you are making a film like that, even
though it is very personal and you are talking about politics,
it is absolutely essential that you show who are the victims
of this and to give a sense of how human they are and how
nice attractive people they are. I had to clear with Coutard
that we had to linger on the people to make it clear that
we were attacking the establishment and not the people. I
mean, how they missed at the time that it is an affectionate
film amazes me.
The film makes it very clear that women were
not respected in Ireland at that time.
We filmed the scene with the students for about
an hour and the female student was brushed aside each time.
And I'll tell you something else about the students, which
is a bit shocking. You know they weren't students from UCD
but from Trinity and Trinity was the one place in Ireland
to which the church had absolutely no access or authority.
So why was it that even in Trinity they weren't even allowed
to talk about politics? They were supposed to be the future
leaders of the country.
But that is a good example of how the views
of Catholic culture in Ireland permeate through into secular
culture.
It just shows that if the brainwashing goes
on too long in the church and the establishment it will even
seep into places that could quite easily stand independently.
I found the scene with the married woman
talking about 'coitus interruptus' really heartbreaking. You
put her voice over images of a beach with a ship in the background.
It was Dollymount Strand. What is great about
that place is that the tide is always out and you have these
lovely patterns on the sand I thought it would work very well.
I wanted it to be, not decorative, but in some way poetic
and still not intrude on what she was saying.
How did you find that woman?
Well I knew her and her views. But no one could
know who she was in those days so I had to record it myself
in a hotel. I never said who she was. But also it was clear
enough that she wasn't a working class person. It was important
to show that middle class people who were supposed to be educated
should still be the victims.
What struck me about it was that she was
not bitter at all.
I chose her for that reason but also because
she would say, 'Oh that little bit of suffering did me good'
you know the awful way that the church is put on you.
Yes the Irish totally fetishize suffering.
Where did the thought come from to make a film? Did you feel
that your newspaper articles weren't powerful enough?
First of all I was a great film fan. I was in
Paris at that time and that is the importance of an environment
on the possibility of making films. You know people thought
that making films was like building a block of flats and it
more or less was with a crew of 150 with all kinds of expenses
but I was in Paris at the right time where it was normal for
people to take a camera to express themselves as it was for
Italians to sing or something. I thought that since I was
a great film buff and going to the cinemateque all the time,
it would be a bit of an adventure and a great and satisfying
way to stretch myself. And then I was able to get Coutard
which was absolutely marvellous.
Did you feel intimidated by the prospect
of making a film? How did you approach it?
Well the only way to approach it is to remain
in a state of passion all the time and I was only afraid that
we wouldn't be able to get what we wanted. I was just going
like a demon and also it was different than someone who is
in the profession who wanted to make a film. And so I just
thought that we would go and go and go and see how much we
could cram in within the space of time. And Coutard was quite
expensive in the sense that he was highly paid but he would
give you more usable stuff in half an hour than most people
would give you in a week. But also what happened was I made
him work on his day off. I heard that Huston was up in town
and I needed him in the film. And one thing that he said to
me was - Ah Peter isn't there something strange about independent
filmmakers they never seem to need to eat and they never seem
to need to sleep and they never seem to need to shit.
The Rocky Road to Dublin is somewhere
between fine art and documentary.
I was very concerned, as I would be in writing,
to get something like a little bit of poetry into it and to
have a very powerful visual element to it. Then if it works
it is compensation for the hell you have to go through. People
ask me why I didn't make another film. What happened was that
I moved to England and it was like going from a vineyard into
a cemetery where all the rules for making films were completely
against me. I was spoilt to imagine that with your first film,
you raise the money from a friend and you choose the cast
and crew as it were, you write it, you choose the music edit
and everything. I'm sure I would have come a cropper if I
had succeeded in penetrating the English industry. Well the
only thing that I could have passion for at that time - it
was in the early seventies - was Ireland. It was 1971, internment
without trial, 1972 Bloody Sunday and the British film industry
wouldn't touch anything about Ireland apart from news reports.
It wasn't for about 20 years that they started to really draw
on those themes as a source for gangster films. So I was blocked
in every way. But another thing was that I had a very interesting
job. I was a feature writer on Harry Evans' Sunday Times
and I was made television critic. I was there from 1972 to
1976, which was the golden period of English television drama
and there were wonderful documentary films. I also had a couple
of kids to bring up - it is something men always say and they
leave out the fact that the wife was also working. But anyway,
if I had had a less interesting job I would probably have
exposed myself to that terrible life again. But I think England
would have defeated me in any event.
Would you consider making films now?
Well it is getting a bit late now. People have
asked me over and over again would I not make a sequel to
The Rocky Road. You couldn't do it. The past really
is a different country. That place even for me is pretty mythical.
I was fascinated by the footage of you at
the Cannes Film Festival in 1968 especially when you stood
up and said that it was so unfair to stop the festival after
the screening of The Rocky Road because all the other
filmmakers didn't have a chance to show their films.
Well the problem there was that the footage
of that is owned by Belgian television and they are a rapacious
lot. They wanted 7,000 euro for that 59 seconds and if you
went into 61 sec it would be 7,000 more. But I was making
an important point there - I mean I didn't finish the point.
We brought the country to a standstill. We have all these
cinemas and equipment and everything, and what we should do
is liberate everything and everybody who wants to show his
film and not stop showing films. And Godard is a mad man,
a tremendously talented guy, but he is a complete fucking
lunatic. Afterwards how it ended up was he said to me, 'We
are doing the revolution and all you are talking about is
tracking shots and close-ups' and I wasn't talking about any
such thing.
Godard's egotistic dogmatism is almost as
bad as the people who were banning your film in Ireland. Is
it the flip side of the same coin?
Well he is Swiss and that might explain a lot
of it. I mean for his first four or five films he did marvellous
films, wonderfully innovative in a perverse and hugely self-indulgent
way but they worked perfectly well. But then in the end he
sort of gave up everything and gave himself over to the revolution
as it were and to be one of them, which of course is a load
of rubbish because he could never be one of anybody. He went
through this period of turning out really dumb films actually.
I knew him before as a journalist and he was always a bloody
pain in the arse.
I think you have to be like that.
You have to be and he really kicked his way
into the front. And he kicked his way through the film industry
and in fact one time he got his producer on the ground and
kicked him.
How do you feel about the response to the
film here in England?
Well I suppose what is marvellous is that an
English paper would say that the most interesting and significant
film of the week is the retrieval from obscurity of The
Rocky Road To Dublin. If it was the most interesting and
significant film of the week in England, what the hell was
it for Ireland? I was really startled that we got this kind
of coverage. I'm not modest or anything. It was established
in 1968 that it was a great film but I didn't think that there
was any way that an old documentary would have access to that
level of coverage in the paper where in The Independent,
The Rocky Road To Dublin gets 4 stars, Pride &
Prejudice three - I mean there must be something in the
water!
But think of the mechanisms involved in the
making of Pride & Prejudice and yet you get the
4 stars. That is wonderful.
Yes.
Rocky Road To Dublin is out
on DVD on the 24 October 2005.
|